Chelsea Yacht And Boat Co Ltd V Pope

Chelsea yacht and boat company v pope [2001] 2 all er 409 is an english legal case. the case established that a houseboat its cannot form part of the land (real property) as the degree of annexation is insufficient.. Free legal content from lexisnexis butterworths: all england reporter cases - chelsea yacht and boat club ltd v pope - [2000] all er (d) 501. Conversely, in chelsea yacht & boat co ltd v pope [2000] 1 wlr 1941 a houseboat was moored to a pontoon, and could be untied, with the mains service disconnected; it was found to be a chattel since it did not form part of the realty..

Chelsea yacht and boat co v pope 2000 or originally intended to move about tristmere ltd v mew and another 2011 - houseboats resting on wooden platforms above hmw. Chelsea yacht and boat co ltd v pope-however, a boat that is moored securely and on a more permanent basis (and used as a nightclub), may become part of the land - rudd v cinderella rockerfellas ltd-air conditioning units are a fixture (because they are intended to remain there. In hulme v brigham , however, heavy printing presses which stood on the floor without any attachment other than the force of gravity, were chattels in chelsea yacht & boat co v pope , a houseboat which was moored to the bank and which moved up and down with the tide, was held to be a chattel..

chelsea yacht and boat co ltd v pope